Home » Four Types of Authors Who Shouldn’t Read Reviews

Four Types of Authors Who Shouldn’t Read Reviews

Four Types of Authors Who Shouldn’t Read Reviews

Should authors read reviews?

That was the question Jordan Dane posed at The Kill Zone blog last week. I also saw the same question addressed in an author Facebook group I’m a member of, and (indirectly) on Seth Godin’s blog.

Three times in three days. That must be significant …

I’m not yet a published author, so haven’t yet had to face this decision for myself. But I do have a lot of experience from the other side of the question: as a reviewer. I’ve reviewed around 900 books on Goodreads, and most of those reviews have also appeared on other sites: Amazon, my blog, and other retail sites.

My reviewing experience leads me to believe that not all authors should read reviews of their books. Here are some authors who shouldn’t read reviews of their books.

Authors Who Forget Reviews are For Readers

Reviewers don’t always agree (you can see that by reading the reviews to any great work of fiction). But one thing we do agree on is that reviews are for readers. Not for authors.

As reviewers see it, the purpose of an online book review is to share information which might persuade a like-minded reader to read the book … or not. And either is a valid conclusion. It takes several hours to read an average novel, and a good review takes a while to write, and to post. Especially if you cross-post across several sites, as I do.

Reviewers aren’t doing this to please authors. Reviewers do not exist to promote your book for free (although some do). If they are, it’s skirting close to Amazon’s definition of a “promotional review”, which is then at risk of being deleted.
No, reviewers review for themselves, and for like-minded readers. They do it for fun, for free.

Authors Who Focus on the Wrong Things

As Seth Godin points out, if there 100 glowing five-star reviews and one stinking one-star review (or even a well written three-star review), we focus on the negative. We ignore the positive, even when it’s overwhelming. It’s human nature.

Yes, some reviews are unfair. Some reviews are written by people with issues. Some people should be banned from the internet because they seem unable to communicate online in a mature and adult manner. In an ideal world, everyone would love everything we write and our reviews would be all fluffy unicorns and rainbows.

But life isn’t fair. Everyone has issues. And the world would be a better place if some people were prevented from ever sharing their opinions again (including most politicians, celebrities, and especially reality TV stars). No writer can appeal to everyone. Not even JK Rowling.

The critical reviewers probably aren’t your target reader. So we need to ignore the naysayers and focus on the positive reviews. If we can’t do that, we shouldn’t read reviews.

Authors Who Are Seeking Validation

If we’re reading book reviews to validate ourselves—as a person, or as a writer … just don’t. My worth as a human being is entirely separate from some random reader/reviewer’s opinion of my book (or my blog post). So is yours.

Just because someone doesn’t like your book doesn’t mean they don’t like you. And vice versa. Some of my closest writer friends write fantasy—a genre I have a lot of trouble enjoying. That doesn’t mean I don’t like them as people. It doesn’t mean they aren’t good writers. It just means I don’t enjoy the genre they write.

Authors Who Respond to Reviews

This is one of the first rules of being an author: don’t respond to reviews. Don’t respond to positive reviews—it can look needy and stalkerish (as if you’ve got nothing better to do than read and comment on reviews). And don’t respond to critical reviews—that never ends well for the author.

This should seem obvious. Yet just this week I was checking the Amazon reviews of a book I was considering buying and I saw the author had commented on the top-ranked review. The review basically said the self-help book contained no new information on productivity for writers, and that the author’s suggestion writers give up coffee and chocolate was unrealistic.

I thought this was a helpful review—there is no way I’m giving up coffee or chocolate on anything less than do-it-or-die orders from a doctor. So there is no point in me even considering a book with this recommendation. It’s not helpful.

The author didn’t agree. She copied and pasted a five-star review that said the book had helped the reviewer.

I’d already decided not to buy the book (see above points about coffee and chocolate), but now I’m hesitant to buy or review any of her books. I don’t want an honest review to come back and haunt me if she takes issue with my view should it differ from hers. (As it does. I don’t believe authors should respond to critical reviews. She obviously has no issue with the idea).

So Should Authors Read Reviews?

If you can read reviews of your book without becoming one of “those” authors, then yes. Otherwise, it might be best to ignore reviews, or get someone to vet them for you.

What do you think? Should authors read reviews of their books?

This post is part of the June 2017 #AuthorToolboxBlogHop, a monthly blog hop for authors who want to learn more about being authors. Posts are related to the craft of writing, editing, querying, marketing, publishing, blogging tips for authors, and reviews of author-related products. The hop the brainchild of Raimey Gallant. To find this month’s posts:

 

Subscribe to my monthly newsletter and receive an exclusive guide to publishers specializing in Christian fiction.

You're subscribed! Check your email for your exclusive guide to publishers specializing in Christian fiction. If you don't get it within ten minutes, email me at igoulton@christianediting.co.nz.

12 comments

  1. Some great thoughts, Iola. I once gave a good review of a book on Goodreads from a previously unknown (to me) author and I was really surprised that she responded. She was just thanking me and saying she was glad I’d liked the book, but it did make me feel a bit uncomfortable. Up until that point, I was thinking that I was interacting with other readers (though of course, authors are also on Goodreads). It did make me think twice about putting negative reviews up though.

    Re getting validation from reviews (or lack thereof), maybe all authors should sign up to a 12-step group before putting their book on the market. ‘Hello, my name is Nola and I seek validation from good reviews’ 🙂

    • Iola says:

      I had the same feeling the first time an author commented on one of my Goodreads reviews. Like you, at least the review had been positive. I also had an author respond to my (critical) Goodreads review … via Twitter. That felt a little stalkerish.

      I love the idea of a 12-step programme!

  2. “I’d already decided not to buy the book (see above points about coffee and chocolate)…” You’re hilarious. This was an eye-opening post for me. I’m not published, so it hadn’t occurred to me whether or not to comment on reviews of my books. Someone tweeted (or social media somethinged) the other day that the author liked their review. I wonder if this is a bad idea as well. Yikes. Also, there’s the new social media site for readers called Litsy, and it’s very interactive, so I wonder what will happen there, because the norms on this site are different than any other bookish social media site around. Thanks for the awesome post, Iola!

    • Iola says:

      You can tell on Goodreads who has Liked your review, and I’m always in two minds if an author does click that Like button. You can’t tell on Amazon … although sometimes the first vote appears so quickly I think it has to be the author.

      I’m on Litsy, but haven’t really worked out a lot of the interactive elements. I love the fact that the ratings are basically thumbs up or thumbs down, and the visual element (I mostly post book memes and quotes). I think I need to connect with more like-minded readers to make it work for me.

  3. Authors should probably not read any reviews. Taste is subjective, and its impossible to please everyone. Spending your time reading reviews is just taking time away from being productive.

    • Iola says:

      We’re writers. We’ve raised procrastination to an art form.

      Perhaps that’s what reading review is – choosing procrastination over productivity. Or maybe it’s living in the past rather than creating the future?

      Thanks for sharing.

  4. I like Seth Godin’s advice. Somehow it’s the negative that sticks with us and not the positive. Reviews are a tricky thing. For me there’s not much value to reading them after the book is published. It’s better to get critical feedback before a book it out there. At least then there’s a chance to fix it. I try not to read negative reviews, and have to admit I sometimes read positive reviews just to make myself happy!

    • Iola says:

      I’m someone who often remembers the negative more than the positive, which is why Seth Godin’s post resonated with me.

      And I do agree – the time for an author to get feedback is before the book is written.

      Thanks for stopping by!

  5. Louise says:

    Some really good points for not reading reviews. I’d be tempted to hear what people thought, but perhaps it’s best to leave reviews for potential readers!

    • Iola says:

      I have no problems with authors reading reviews (and even sharing them on social media) … but only if they can read them without being tempted to fall into any of these traps 🙂

  6. “This is one of the first rules of being an author: don’t respond to reviews.” YES! And as you said, that goes for both positive and negative reviews. Nothing good will come of it. I will probably need to be the type that has to have them vetted, as I take things to personal and a negative one would gnaw at me for awhile.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *