Home » #AuthorToolBoxBlogHop | Copyright for Writers—Understanding Copyright

Copyright for Writers—Understanding Copyright

#AuthorToolBoxBlogHop | Copyright for Writers—Understanding Copyright

This post is part of the monthly Author ToolBox Blog Hop, organised by Raimey Gallant. We now have over 40 blogs participating. To find more Blog Hop posts:

What is Copyright?

All writers need to understand the basics of copyright for two reasons:

      • So they know their rights in regard to the work they write and publish
      • So they do not infringe the rights of other creatives

So what is copyright?

In essence, copyright is the right to copy. (Sounds obvious, right?)

Copyright includes the right to reproduce, distribute, and display copyrighted works. It is a form of intellectual property, an asset that has monetary value. Copyright law is designed to protect the rights of those who create content.

What Does Copyright Cover?

Copyright covers original works, whether words, sounds, or images, and whether published or unpublished. This includes:

      • Books
      • Blog posts
      • Music
      • Lyrics
      • Movies
      • TV shows
      • Scripts
      • Plays
      • Speeches
      • Poems

Yes, copyright broad. Basically, copyright covers the creation of any original work, in any form.

There are a few things copyright doesn’t cover, such as:

      • Ideas
      • Book titles
      • Words

I’ll deal with these in a later post.

Who Owns the Copyright to a Published Book?

The author (well, they should). The author signs a contract with a publisher which licences specific rights. This licence gives the publisher the temporary right to reproduce, distribute, and display copyrighted works (i.e. to print and sell the book).

A good contract will specify what rights are included, e.g. the format of the book, the language, and the countries the book can be sold. It will also include how the author can get those rights back (e.g. so the author can self-publish the work). Never sign a contract that’s for life of copyright. That basically means the publisher owns the book, not you.

If you want to know more about the ins and outs of publishing contracts, I recommend Kristine Kathryn Rusch’s blog.

Copyright is Automatic

Copyright is automatic for work first published after 1 March 1989. Works do not have to have a © symbol or notice of copyright to be covered. The law is more complex for earlier work, so it’s best to assume a work is covered by copyright unless you have evidence to the contrary.

Copyright is International

All countries have laws relating to copyright. While there are minor differences (e.g. the length of copyright, whether you need to register copyright), the principles are the same, thanks to the Berne Convention.

There is a legal concept known as the long arm of the law. I thought this a cliché used in Western movies, but it apparently is a real thing. Author and lawyer Courtney Milan says:

you can be prosecuted by a state so long as you have “minimum contacts” with that state.

Milan was talking about online giveaways, not copyright law, but my unlegal interpretation* of long-arm jurisdiction is that anything you publish needs to abide by:

      • The copyright laws where you live.
      • The copyright laws where you publish.
      • The copyright laws where your readers live.

So a blog post (like this one) that attracts readers from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, the UK, and the US needs to comply with US copyright law. And Australian copyright law. And Canadian copyright law. And New Zealand copyright law. And … you get the picture.

Copyright is Universal

Fortunately, most of the principles are universal, thanks to the Berne Convention. Where things differ by country, my suggestion is to abide by the most conservative. So if a work under copyright in country A but not in country B, I suggest you treat the work as if it was still under copyright.

Here are two well-known examples:

      • The King James Bible
      • Peter Pan

The King James Bible

Most American Christians will tell you the King James Bible is out of copyright. However, it is still under copyright in the United Kingdom—copyright is held by the Crown i.e. HM Queen Elizabeth II. King James Bibles are published in the UK by the Crown’s patentee, Cambridge University Press.

So if it’s reasonable to assume your book might be purchased in the UK, it would be appropriate to include the appropriate copyright statement. (Not that I’ve ever heard of the Queen suing anyone for copyright infringement over the King James Bible. But it could happen.)

Note that it’s not the original text of the Bible which is subject to copyright, but the translation.

So all more modern versions of the Bible, including the New King James Version, are under copyright, because they are translations. Most modern translations allow authors to quote up to a specific number of verses without written permission as long as the follow specific guidelines. You can find up-to-date copyright and permission information by clicking on the relevant version at Bible Gateway.

Peter Pan

JM Barrie gifted the copyright to Peter Pan (the play and the later novelisation) to Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children in 1929. That copyright originally expired in 1987, but the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 includes a clause that specifically states GOSH has a right to royalty in perpetuity in the UK for stage productions, broadcasting, or publication.

But that doesn’t apply internationally. The novel is considered to be in the public domain in most countries, although the play version is still in copyright in the US until 2023 (so if Hollywood wish to produce a Peter Pan movie, the producers must licence the rights from GOSH).

Copyright Infringement

Copyright infringement is a big deal. It’s against the law in the same way as stealing is against the law.

Plagiarism is quoting other people’s work without appropriate attribution.

Author Rachel Ann Nunes found her Christian romantic suspense novel, A Bid for Love, had been plagiarised by “Sam Taylor Mullens”. Mullens was later discovered to be Tiffanie Rushton, a teacher from Utah. She also indulged in identity theft, using the real names of her third-grade students to create fake accounts to review her own books. Yes, a real sweetie.

Rushton changed the point of view in A Big for Love from third person to first person, and added some sex scenes. Nunes started a GoFundMe page to fund her legal defence. It’s taken four years, but she’s finally been awarded the maximum statutory penalty, $150,000 (which doesn’t sound nearly enough for a case that’s taken four years).

Does This Mean I Can’t Use Copyrighted Material?

You can still use copyrighted material if you have written permission from the copyright holder (note that this may not be the original creator—Paul McCartney doesn’t own the rights to most of the 250+ songs he created with John Lennon).

You can also use copyrighted material without permission in certain specific circumstances, as outlined in the US doctrine of Fair Use.

I’ll be back next week to discuss Fair Use, and give some tips for using copyrighted material without getting into trouble.

Please note that I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. There is a lot of great information about copyright on the internet, but none of it is legal advice. To get legal advice, you pay a lawyer licensed to practice in your state or country. 

What questions do you have about copyright?

 

Subscribe to my monthly newsletter and receive an exclusive guide to publishers specializing in Christian fiction.

 

Sign up to my newsletter, and I'll send you monthly news and updates on writing, editing, publishing, and marketing, and relevant promotional material. I won't send spam, and you can unsubscribe at any time. Please read my Privacy Policy for details: www.christianediting.co.nz/privacy-policy

You're subscribed! Check your email for your exclusive guide to publishers specializing in Christian fiction. If you don't get it within ten minutes, email me at igoulton@christianediting.co.nz.

25 comments

    • Iola says:

      I’d have to check, but I suspect that retellings might be considered ideas, and therefore not subject to copyright. I’ll check that, and include it in a later post. Parodies are also permitted under copyright.

      GOSH have a great reputation in England. I suspect an author who chose to write a Peter Pan retelling might also choose to donate a percentage of the royalties to GOSH whether it was required or not. Donors are acknowledged—my son’s room had been donated by the Serious Fraud Office.

      As always, this isn’t legal advice 🙂

  1. This was so eye-opening. And so sad that happened to Nunes! The questions that I still have relate to the public domain. I need to figure out how to figure out what’s in the public domain. For instance, the quotes that authors often start their books with: how do they figure out if they’re in the public domain, and if they aren’t…especially the quotes from shorter poems, because one line of verse seems like a large percentage of the complete work.

    • Iola says:

      You’re right – one line of verse is a large percentage of a completed work.

      As a rough guide, if the author or creator is still alive, or if the work was published after 1978, the work is almost certainly still under copyright.

      Conversely, almost anything published in the US before 1 January 1923 is probably public domain. And anything published by someone who died more than seventy years ago is probably in the public domain.

      For works published between 1923 and 1978, you’d need to check based on when and where the author died, and when and where the work was first published.

  2. Erika Beebe says:

    Thank you Iola! I work in public relations and worry about Copyright all the time. I can’t wait for your next post as I would love to know more about fair use so I don’t step on toes 🙂

  3. This was informative, thank you! Especially being a Youtuber, copyright is always looming me and I’m terrified to cross the line. I’ll be looking forward to the post about Fair Use!

    • Iola says:

      I think it’s always best to err on the side of caution!

      When it comes to something like YouTube (or a book blog), it depends on what material you’re quoting and why. You can quote material (with attribution) for purposes of review or criticism. But it’s a tough one – it seems to me that YouTube is full of copyrighted works uploaded by people other than the copyright holder.

  4. I always enjoy reading your posts. This is a great reminder to pay attention to copyright issues. Lyrics in a songs seems to catch people. I think I read somewhere you could reference one line without permission. Is that true? Also I think it’s two lines of a poem. I suppose it’s always good to check whenever using material created by someone else.

    • Iola says:

      Thank you!

      Yes, lyrics are a big problem. There is no absolute test as to what you can quote beyond the title (as titles aren’t covered by copyright). The Chicago Manual of Style says a very small percentage “can be considered infringement if it constitutes the heart of a work being quoted.” (CMOS 4.79) That’s the problem with song lyrics: the one short line we want to quote is often the heart of the song or poem.

    • Iola says:

      I agree. I often see writers moaning about online privacy, then see them breaching copyright themselves in some way. I don’t condone piracy, but we need to make sure we’re playing fair ourselves before we can castigate others for not playing fair.

  5. M.L. Keller says:

    Great post. Thanks for sharing
    I really appreciate that you clarified that transitions of public domain works are still under copyright. Lots of people make this mistake.

  6. Anna says:

    You’ve explained this really, really well. Not long ago I was trying to explain that giving someone credit was avoiding plagiarism but it still could be copyright infringement without written permission. She was writing a book based on a course presented years ago and using direct quotes from handouts and tutorials. I told her best to check with who taught the course. What do you think?

    Sorry I’m late.

    Anna from elements of emaginette

    • Iola says:

      Yes, it could still be copyright infringement if she is copying information without permission, although it may depend on whether a judge considers the quotes to be fair use or not. It also depends on how the information is being presented. It’s more likely to be considered copyright infringement when the information is quoted in a book people pay money for than on a free website that includes a link for visitors to find out more (and possibly buy the original material).

      Personally, I’d always err on the side of caution and not include more than a sentence or two without written permission.

  7. Ron Oommen says:

    Hi I found this post via your twitter page. Great site and enjoying the learning as a wannbee writer.

    Can copyrighted material be quoted with credit and references provided? Good point regarding the KJV. Helped a friend edit a book he was writing some years ago and we discover that it’s copyrighted in the UK! The US sources we checked all told us it was public domain. Goes to show that ine can’t be too careful.

    Thanks for the opportunity to leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *